Tuesday, September 29, 2015

The Social Facets of Clothing


There was a time when clothes were worn just for covering our skin from external weather conditions. But times have since changed. The first striking feature of a person living in today’s society is the attire that he/she sports. Thanks to the developments in the apparel segment world over coupled by wide publicity, most of the people are conscious about what they are wearing. They want their character to be projected to outside world just by means of their clothing. It is no way an exaggeration to tell that the modern day’s clothing has turned out to be a testimonial of a person’s thoughts!  


Some clothes provide ‘identity’ to a person – like a Brahmin can be identified with a dhoti and ‘Yagyopaveet’ (sacred thread); police personnel, nurses, fire personnel, etc. can be identified with their respective uniforms; and, so on.  Such personnel are recognised not by their name but purely by their attire.


Fashion has invaded every noticeable industry and apparel industry, in particular, that we now see countless styling patterns in whatever we wear, right from a cap to a shoe. The choice is made by a person depending on what suites him/her the best. But this very ‘choice’ has stirred up a hornet’s nest in today’s society.  
                                          

‘Comfortability’ has a red line:

             There is a section of people that talks about the factor of ‘comfortability’, mostly as an excuse for what they are wearing. But comfortability has a definite limit in today’s society. None is living in an absolutely goon-free society. This mask of comfortability has the potential to raise the eyebrows of these goons and provoke them to cause harm to people, particularly to, female gender. Of course, whatever clothes that we wear should be comfortable on us but not at the cost of our very own precious lives.


              Here, the question of ‘gender’ arises because there exists gender based clothing and provocative clothing has a definite place in it. It is wise to refrain ourselves from picking up such clothes lest there is a trouble that one always carries in one’s pocket. Ultimately, the clothing is a necessity but not a show of obscenity!


Clothes are deceptive:

             Clothes can conceal the deceptive thoughts of a person. One cannot become a ‘gentleman’ or a ‘gentlelady’ merely by their attire. They can be ascertained only by their thoughts and actions. There are myriad of incidents where in a gentleman by dress turned out be a real villain at the end and vice versa. So, attire is not at all a parameter to judge a person’s temperament. 

                                                            
              There is also another sect of people who say, “Attire is not what matters, but it is the attitude that matters the most”. They are right until they do not cross the boundaries set by our society. This doctrine is employed by some of the globally top corporates while recruiting their employees, albeit in different forms, like conducting a personality test, stress interview, etc... In such situations, clothing is irrelevant, it is only how you project yourself with your thoughts and actions that matters.


               Clothing is among one of the ‘basic needs’ of a human. But the need should never become one’s frailty and that depends on one’s perspective and ideology of looking at things!



***

Sunday, August 16, 2015

The Facts of "Interpretations"

***

All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at that time is a function of   power and not truth” – F. W. Nietzsche.


It is very common to see that when a division bench in a court of law hears a case, none of the judges will deliver the same verdict. Likewise when a literary work of the past or to that matter, any literary work is reviewed by several scholars, none of their interpretations will end on the same note.


When author Jonathan Swift’s 1726 novel, “Gulliver’s Travels” was studied by author Isaac Asimov in 1980, he opined that decoding the ‘mysterious’ phrases used by Swift in his novel was a mere waste of time. When the same novel was studied in 2015 by Professor Irving Rothman, he is perceived to have decrypted the phrases used by Swift in his novel. Professor explains that the words such as “Borach Mivola”, “Hnea Yahoo” and others are wilful distortions of the Israeli language, Hebrew.


The English word “Ok” is spelt “Okay” and also as “Okie” and “Okies” (all words mean the same) in online/sms lingo. Likewise, Professor Irving Rothman has propounded that the words used by Jonathan Swift like “Mivola”, “Yahoo” and “Hnea” are deliberately twisted versions of the original Hebrew words, “Mivolim”, “YHVH”and “Ayn” respectively.


Professor Irving Rothman may or may not be correct in his study but reviews are intended to be read and not to be taken for granted until and unless supported by evidences because interpretations are always subject to change according to time as Nietzsche rightly said.



*****